The Basics of Limited Liability Partnerships and 5 Reasons They May Be Right for You
Brief Introduction: Outline the Basics of Limited Liability Partnerships
When launching a new enterprise, one of the most critical decisions an entrepreneur faces is the selection of a suitable legal structure. While sole proprietorships and conventional partnerships have their merits, they expose business owners to unlimited personal liability. On the other end of the spectrum, private limited companies (“Sdn. Bhd.” in Malaysia) offer limited liability protection but come with relatively more rigid compliance requirements. Straddling a middle ground is the Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), an increasingly popular entity type that provides a blend of flexibility and protection.
The concept of LLPs emerged in various legal systems worldwide as a mechanism to extend the benefits of a partnership—namely, operational flexibility and straightforward governance—while retaining the crucial benefit of limited liability akin to that enjoyed by company shareholders. In Malaysia, the relevant legal framework is primarily governed by the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2012 (Act 743) (hereinafter “LLP Act 2012”).1 This legislation sets out the rules for formation, governance, compliance, and dissolution of LLPs. Similar legislative frameworks exist in other jurisdictions, such as the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 in the United Kingdom and variations of LLP statutes in numerous states across the United States.
Under the LLP Act 2012, an LLP must be registered with the Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia (SSM), also known as the Companies Commission of Malaysia.2 Once incorporated, the LLP is recognized as a separate legal entity, distinct from its partners. This means that the LLP itself can own property, enter into contracts, and sue or be sued in its own name. Critically, partners of an LLP are not generally liable for the LLP’s debts and liabilities beyond their agreed contribution, barring scenarios where personal guarantees or wrongdoing (such as fraud or negligence) may pierce the limited liability shield.3
Apart from liability issues, LLPs also boast a simplified compliance regime. While conventional private limited companies face numerous statutory obligations—filing annual returns, audited accounts, and holding formal annual general meetings—LLPs, both in Malaysia and elsewhere, often enjoy reduced procedural requirements. Indeed, an LLP typically only needs to maintain proper financial records, appoint a compliance officer, and file basic annual declarations.4
However, whether an LLP is right for a business largely depends on the specific needs and strategic objectives of the entrepreneurs in question. The following sections explore five reasons why one might opt for an LLP over alternative structures.
5 Reasons Why They Might Be the Appropriate Business Structure for You
1. Limited Liability Protection
Perhaps the most prominent attraction of an LLP is right there in the name: limited liability. Under a traditional partnership, partners can be held jointly and severally liable for the debts and liabilities of the enterprise. In plain terms, if the partnership defaults on a significant obligation or if legal claims are made, the personal assets of each partner could be at risk. By contrast, an LLP places a legal ‘shield’ between business liabilities and personal property—subject, of course, to certain exceptions relating to fraud or wrongful acts.5
a) Separation of Liability
Under Section 21 of the Malaysian LLP Act 2012, the LLP is deemed a separate legal entity from its partners.6 This separation means that, in typical circumstances, the debts and obligations of the LLP do not become personal obligations of the partners. If, for instance, the LLP faces insolvency, partners might lose their capital contribution in the business, but their personal bank accounts and family homes typically remain untouched.
b) Exceptions to the Rule
Despite the robust nature of limited liability, it is not an absolute guarantee. A court may “pierce the corporate veil” or, in this case, the LLP veil if partners engage in fraudulent activities or wrongful trading, or if they provide personal guarantees in their individual capacities. The LLP structure is not a license for irresponsible business conduct.7 Nonetheless, for entrepreneurs who act in good faith and abide by legal obligations, an LLP provides a valuable layer of protection.
c) Why Liability Matters
The issue of liability can be determinative of an entrepreneur’s risk appetite. Individuals who place their family’s financial security at the forefront are often swayed by the comfort that an LLP confers. It is a middle ground for those who desire the flexibility of a partnership while still seeking an added degree of personal financial security that is absent in a traditional partnership.
2. Operational Flexibility
Running a limited company can sometimes feel cumbersome. Traditional governance frameworks for companies often entail a hierarchical structure consisting of directors, shareholders, and prescribed annual meetings. LLPs, on the other hand, typically operate with greater freedom in shaping their own internal governance.
a) Tailor-Made Partnership Agreements
An LLP’s internal workings are largely outlined in its partnership agreement, sometimes referred to as an LLP agreement or partnership deed. In Malaysia, Section 9 of the LLP Act 2012 allows partners to define their rights and duties through this agreement.8 The legislation sets minimal mandatory requirements, leaving ample room for partners to customize how decisions are made, how profits are shared, and how disputes are resolved.
b) Absence of Complex Formalities
Though LLPs in Malaysia do have certain filing requirements—such as the need for a compliance officer and the annual declaration, according to Sections 27 and 30 of the LLP Act 2012 respectively9—these are generally less demanding than the obligations imposed on companies. LLPs are typically not required to hold annual general meetings, nor are they required to appoint company secretaries or file audited financial statements in the same manner as private limited companies.10
c) Adaptability for Growth
The LLP structure is also prized for its adaptability. Should the business expand, new partners can be brought in more seamlessly than in a traditional partnership. Additionally, changes in business models can often be accommodated through amendments to the partnership agreement. This agility in governance and structural changes makes the LLP especially appealing to startups, professional service firms, and small-to-medium enterprises that anticipate growth or organizational evolution.
3. Tax Efficiency and Simplified Accounting
While the precise tax treatment of LLPs varies between jurisdictions, many countries—including Malaysia—have established streamlined tax regimes that balance partnership-like pass-through taxation with certain corporate tax elements. Before making a decision, always consult with a qualified tax professional, as each situation can differ depending on personal and business circumstances.
a) Pass-Through Taxation in Some Jurisdictions
In many jurisdictions, LLPs enjoy “pass-through” taxation, meaning that the entity itself is not taxed on profits at the entity level. Instead, each partner reports their share of the LLP’s income or losses on their personal or corporate tax returns.11 This can avoid the issue of double taxation, which occurs when a company’s profits are taxed first at the corporate level and subsequently taxed again when distributed as dividends to shareholders. In Malaysia, however, the tax treatment can differ; LLPs are generally taxed at the corporate tax rate, but with certain allowances and thresholds that might be beneficial if the LLP meets small business criteria.12
b) Simplified Accounting Requirements
Many entrepreneurs are daunted by the prospect of complex accounting and statutory audit obligations. While the LLP Act 2012 does mandate that LLPs keep proper accounting records,13 the administrative burden is frequently lower than that of a private limited company. In some cases, an annual audit may not be mandatory unless it is stipulated by regulatory authorities or demanded by stakeholders.
c) Clarity for Partners
Operating as an LLP often brings clarity to each partner’s tax obligations. Partners can outline their respective profit shares in the LLP agreement, simplifying the process of distributing income and reporting taxes. In a professional service context—such as law firms or accountancy practices—this clarity can be a significant advantage when determining compensation structures.
4. Continuity and Business Perpetuity
A common misconception is that partnerships dissolve automatically upon certain events such as the departure or death of a partner. Under conventional partnership law, this can indeed be the case, causing disruption, uncertainty, and potential dissolution. LLPs, however, are different.
a) Separate Legal Entity with Perpetual Succession
Because an LLP is recognized as a separate legal entity, it retains “perpetual succession.”14 This means that the exit of a partner—whether through retirement, resignation, death, or sale of interest—does not bring the business entity to an end. The LLP continues to exist unless it is expressly wound up or struck off the register by the authorities. This continuity is especially beneficial for enterprises aiming to develop long-term brand recognition and stability.
b) Facilitating Business Transitions
An LLP’s relative permanence also streamlines transitions. If a founding partner wishes to exit, it can be done without forcing an entire business overhaul. The partner’s interest can be transferred to another individual or entity as provided for under the LLP agreement. Such transitions can be easier to navigate than share transfers within a private limited company, where regulatory filings and approvals may be more extensive.
c) Protecting Client and Partner Interests
Professional or family-owned businesses that plan to last for generations often appreciate the continuity feature of LLPs. By establishing and maintaining an LLP, existing partners can reassure clients, suppliers, and investors that the business will continue to operate seamlessly even if one or more partners withdraw from active participation.
5. Ideal for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and Professional Firms
Many entrepreneurs and professional practices gravitate toward the LLP framework due to its intermediate nature between a traditional partnership and a corporation. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), as well as professional service providers, often find LLPs an especially compelling proposition.
a) Balancing Simplicity and Protection
As SMEs scale up, they might find themselves caught in a dilemma: they want the operational simplicity and direct profit-sharing of a partnership, but they also want to safeguard personal assets. The LLP offers precisely this middle ground. For example, a growing architectural firm or digital marketing agency can maintain a small leadership team of partners who share profits directly, without resorting to complex corporate share structures, while simultaneously protecting their personal assets.15
b) Professional Services Preference
In many jurisdictions, LLPs have become the standard for professional service firms—especially law firms, accountancy firms, consultancies, and medical practices (where permitted by local laws).16 The reason is straightforward: these businesses are often run by professionals who prefer a partnership ethos (where each partner has a stake in management) but demand protection from unlimited liability that might arise from the actions of a single negligent partner.
c) Ease of Client Perception
Increasingly, the market recognizes LLPs as mainstream, stable entities. Clients, suppliers, and even investors frequently prefer to engage with businesses that provide some transparency and legal structure, rather than unincorporated partnerships, which can appear less formal. This means that registering as an LLP can boost client confidence and open doors to new business opportunities.
Conclusion
Choosing the right business structure can be a pivotal step toward the success and resilience of your enterprise. The Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) stands out as a modern and flexible structure, offering the limited liability characteristic of corporations and the operational nimbleness typically associated with partnerships.
The Malaysian LLP Act 2012 underscores this hybrid advantage, mandating straightforward incorporation procedures and ongoing compliance requirements, all while conferring significant legal protections upon its partners. An LLP can be especially suitable for entrepreneurial ventures seeking to shield personal assets from business liabilities; for teams of professionals who want to combine forces under a shared enterprise without risking personal bankruptcy should any single area of the firm face liability; and for small and medium enterprises anticipating future expansion but reluctant to shoulder the heavier compliance burdens of a limited company.
Of course, the LLP is by no means a panacea. It is critical to note that the concept of limited liability has limitations: if partners act fraudulently, for instance, personal assets may still be exposed. Further, the taxation of LLPs can vary significantly by jurisdiction, making it imperative to consult tax experts to confirm the precise implications for your situation.
Ultimately, though, if you are looking for:
- Limited liability protection for personal assets,
- Operational flexibility in managing your firm,
- Tax efficiency and simplified accounting (depending on local tax regimes),
- Continuity and business perpetuity, and
- A structure that works well for SMEs and professional partnerships,
then forming an LLP could be the optimal choice. As always, best practice dictates seeking professional advice on legal, accounting, and tax matters to ensure the structure aligns with your overall business objectives. With the right guidance and careful planning, the LLP model can serve as an effective vehicle for growth, risk management, and entrepreneurial success.
References
1 Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2012 (Act 743) (Malaysia). Available at:
https://www.ssm.com.my/Pages/About_SSM/PDF/LLP%20ACT%202012%20-%20For%20Portal_new.pdf (accessed 27 January 2025).
2 Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia (SSM), ‘Limited Liability Partnerships’ (SSM Official Portal) https://www.ssm.com.my/Pages/Services/LLP/Limited-Liability-Partnership.aspx accessed 27 January 2025.
3 LLP Act 2012 (n 1) s 21.
4 Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia, ‘Guidelines for Registration of Limited Liability Partnership’ (April 2013) https://www.ssm.com.my/Documents/LLP/LLP_RegistrationGuidelines.pdf accessed 27 January 2025.
5 Andrew Hicks and S.H. Goo, Cases and Materials on Company Law (8th edn, Oxford University Press 2011) 102.
6 LLP Act 2012 (n 1) s 21.
7 Cheng Han Tan, Company Law (2nd edn, LexisNexis 2020) 156.
8 LLP Act 2012 (n 1) s 9.
9 LLP Act 2012 (n 1) ss 27, 30.
10 LLP Act 2012 (n 1) s 26.
11 HM Revenue & Customs (UK), ‘Partnership Manual’ (HMRC, 2020) https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/partnership-manual accessed 27 January 2025.
12 Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri Malaysia (Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia), ‘Taxation of Limited Liability Partnership’ (IRBM, 2016) http://www.hasil.gov.my/ accessed 27 January 2025.
13 LLP Act 2012 (n 1) s 28.
14 LLP Act 2012 (n 1) s 21(1).
15 Ronald J. Baker, Professional’s Guide to Value Pricing (3rd edn, CCH 2011) 74.
16 Stephen Mayson, Derek French and Christopher Ryan, Mayson, French & Ryan on Company Law (36th edn, Oxford University Press 2019) 204.
This article is written by Vishnu Vijandran (Partner). It only contains general information. It does not constitute legal advice nor an expression of legal opinion and should not be relied upon as such.
.png)
.svg){kind=icon}