Our unique insights into law and business.

There are several methods to enfroce monetary judgments in Malaysia. These include a writ of seizure and sale (auctioning debtor's property), garnishee proceedings (seizing money from debtor’s bank accounts), a charging order (placing a charge on stocks or shares), appointing a receiver (taking income from debtor’s assets), and committal proceedings (imprisoning non-compliant debtors). The suitability of the method depends on the debtor's assets. The judgment debtor summons helps assess the debtor’s ability to pay. Each method has a specific process under the Rules of Court 2012.

In recent months, the Malaysian Ringgit has seen a remarkable rise in value, emerging as one of the best-performing currencies globally against the US Dollar. This significant appreciation has filled many Malaysians with pride, as a stronger currency is often viewed as a sign of economic strength and stability. However, while this newfound strength offers various advantages, it also presents challenges, especially for Malaysian companies involved in cross-border business dealings. For businesses exporting goods, a stronger Ringgit automatically means that purchasers need to pay a higher price, potentially making Malaysian products less competitive in the global market. Conversely, for companies looking to import goods or materials, the current exchange rates may make purchasing from abroad appear enticingly cheap. However, this perceived affordability comes with risks that need to be carefully managed.

This article discusses the implications of entering into contracts tainted with illegality in Malaysia. It examines how Malaysian courts have evolved in handling such contracts, from a strict traditional approach to a more flexible one, influenced by the UK Supreme Court decision in Patel v Mirza. The article highlights key cases where restitution under Section 66 of the Contracts Act 1950 has been granted, allowing parties to recover losses even in contracts involving illegality. However, the application of Section 66 remains a developing area, with some recent cases reflecting caution in its enforcement.

The Federal Court’s decision in Ahmad Ikhwan emphasises the importance and extent of a school’s role in preventing bullying, and effectively epitomises the Malaysian legal zeitgeist insofar as bullying is concerned. This article explores the cases leading up to Ahmad Ikhwan, the decision in Ahmad Ikhwan and its ramifications for learning institutions and the future of anti-bullying law in Malaysia.